BIG RIGSSS! <quote user="Unit_Spectre">Pineapple... I think you're over exaggerating by this. This is Mat Pat's first Persona Theory and mistakes are bound to slip out of the cracks.</quote> I dont think this is over exaggeration, MatPat is just fucking stupid.

<quote user="Kamen_Rider_Ex-aid">I theorize that Akira is a Kamen Rider</quote> <b>completely agree holy shit, akira kamen rider comfirmed</b>

Unit_Specter is only half correct, having a theory that is outlandish can be put out as a theory, however requires stronger evidence . Having a theory with no evidence is just an opinion. Im going to put it his way. Evidence + Statement = Theroy Statement + No Evidence ≠ Theroy

<quote user="Unit_Spectre">Yeah he over thinks and over complicates. So what? Theory is a theory no matter how outlandish or dumb it may sound.</quote> A theroy is supposed to be based off of evidence, and other means. Its like making a debate, but its like its possible, but not impossible. Lets say someone says: 'Akira is a lizard' with no goddamn evidence, its not a fucking theory.

How is makoto and sae thicc like are you even trying to like